The doctrine of particular redemption is worth defining and defending because it gets to the heart of the gospel.
The doctrine of limited atonement — the L in TULIP — teaches that Christ effectively redeems from every people “only those who were chosen from eternity to salvation” (Canons of Dort, II.8). As Ursinus explains in his commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism, Christ’s death was for everyone “as it respects the sufficiency of satisfaction which he made, but not as it respects the application thereof.” In other words, the death of Christ was sufficient to atone for the sins of the whole world, but it was God’s will that it should effectively redeem those and only those who were chosen from eternity and given to Christ by the Father.
Particular redemption is often considered a more favorable term, because the point of the doctrine is not to limit the mercy of God, but to make clear that Jesus did not die in the place of every sinner on the earth, but for his particular people. This is why John 6 says Jesus came to save those the Father had given to him, and why Matthew 1:21 says he died for his people, and John 15:13 says for his friends, and Acts 20:28 says for the church, and Ephesians 5:25 says for his bride, and Ephesians 1:4 says for those chosen in Christ Jesus.
The doctrine of particular redemption is worth defining and defending because it gets to the heart of the gospel. Should we say, “Christ died so that sinners might come to him”? Or “Christ died for sinners”? Did Christ’s work on the cross make it possible for sinners to come to God? Or did Christ’s work on the cross actually reconcile sinners to God? In other words, does the death of Jesus Christ make us save-able or does it make us saved?
If the atonement is not particularly and only for the sheep, then either we have universalism — Christ died in everyone’s place and therefore everyone is saved — or we have something less than full substitution. “We are often told that we limit the atonement of Christ,” Charles Spurgeon observed, “because we say that Christ has not made a satisfaction for all men, or all men would be saved.” On the contrary, Spurgeon continued, “We say Christ so died that he infallibly secured the salvation of a multitude that no man can number, who through Christ’s death not only may be saved, but are saved, must be saved, and cannot by any possibility run the hazard of being anything but saved.”
Christ does not come to us merely saying, “I’ve done my part. I laid down my life for everyone because I have saving love for everyone in the whole world. Now, if you would only believe and come to me, I can save you.” Instead, he says to us, “I was pierced for your transgressions. I was crushed for your iniquities” (Isaiah 53:5). “I have purchased with my blood men for God from every tribe and language and people and nation” (Revelation 5:9). “I myself bore your sins in my body on the tree, so that you might infallibly die to sins and assuredly live for righteousness. For my wounds did not merely make healing available. They healed you” (1 Peter 2:24).
Praise be to our Good Shepherd who didn’t just make salvation possible but sustained the anger of God in body and soul, bore the curse, and laid down his life for the sheep (John 10:11).
Kevin DeYoung is senior pastor at Christ Covenant Church in Matthews, North Carolina, and an assistant professor of systematic theology at Reformed Theological Seminary in Charlotte. He is also the author of dozens of books, including “Just Do Something,” “The Biggest Story,” and “Crazy Busy.”
Kommentare